COMPARING INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN TURKEY AND ARGENTINA
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Comparative Education is a discipline helps to identify the similarities and differences and explains the facts appearing similar between two or more education systems in different cultures and various countries, and puts forward useful suggestions about the ways to educate people (Türkoğlu, 1985). Since Salamanca Statement (UNESCO, 1994), inclusive education has got considerable steps globally. That has made the governments take the action to apply educational policies to eliminate students’ disadvantage arising from gender, disability, culture, ethnicity, socio economic background etc. The purpose of this paper is to compare inclusive education in Turkey and Argentina. Bereday's (1964) comparative education model has been conducted through the study. Comparing inclusive education in Turkey and Argentina not only contribute to better understand the inclusive education implications in these two developing countries but also define problems and propose solutions. While inclusive education policies in Turkey focus on disabled students and students with learning difficulties, they focus on disadvantaged groups to provide educational equality.
Keywords: Comparative education, inclusive education, Turkey, ArgentinaArticle Details
Authors retain copyright to their work, licensing it under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License and grant the journal exclusive right of first publication with the work simultaneously and it allows others to copy and redistribute the work for non-commercial purposes, with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in IOJET and provided that no changes were made on the article.
References
Armstrong, D., Armstrong, A. C., & Spandagou, I. (2011). “Inclusion: By choice or by chance? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(1), 29–39.
Auguste, S., Echart, M., & Francheeti, F. (2008). The Quality of Education in Argentina. Inter American Development Bank, (January), 1–149. Retrieved from http://www.iadb.org/res/laresnetwork/files/pr294finaldraft.pdf
Bereday, G. Z. . (1964). Comparative method in education. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston Inc.
Cakiroglu, O., & Melekoglu, M. A. (2014). Statistical trends and developments within inclusive education in Turkey. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(8), 798–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2013.836573
Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. (2016). Dokuzuncu kalkınma planı (2007-2013).
Dış Ekonomik İlişkiler Kurulu. (2014). Arjantin Ülke Raporu.
Eğitim Reformu Girişimi. (2011). Kaynaştırma/Bütünleştirme Yoluyla Eğitimde Dünyadan ve Türkiye’den İyi Örnekler.
Gorostiaga, J. M., & Ferreira, A. (2012). Discourses and policies on educational quality in Argentina, 1990-2010. Research in Comparative and International Education, 7(3), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2012.7.3.364
Graciela, R. F. (2007). Childrens Rights: International and National Laws and Practices (Vol. 1582). Argentina.
IBE-UNESCO. (2007). International Workshop on Inclusive Education, Andean and Southern Cone Regions; IBE-UNESCO preparatory report for the 48th ICE on inclusive education. Buenos Aires.
Kargın, T. (2004). Kaynaştırma: Tanımı, Gelişimi, İlkeleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 5(2), 1–13.
MEB. (2006). Özel eğitim hizmetleri yöntemeliği. Ankara.
MEB. (2010). İlköğretim Okullarındaki Kaynaştırma Uygulamalarının Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara.
MEB. (2016). Milli Eğitim İstatistikleri: Örgün Eğitim. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
Mlli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2013). Çocuk gelişimi ve eğitimi: Kaynaştırma eğitimi. Ankara.
Munoz, V. (2012). The right to education: A comparative view Argentina, Uruguay, Chile and Finland. Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: a textbook. Chile.
Noah, M., & Jennifer, A. J. (2013). Methodological issues in comparative education studies: An exploration of the Approaches of Kandel and Holmes. Journal of Edcational Review, 6(3).
OECD. (2003). Education policy analysis iversity, inclusion and equity: Insights from Special Needs Provision. Paris.
OECD. (2010). Education at a Glance OECD Indicators 2010 Annex 3: Sources , methods and technical notes.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). (2007). Students with Disabilities, Learning Difficulties and Disadvantages: Policies, Statistics and Indicators;, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264009813-en
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). (2016). PISA 2015 Results: Excellence and Equity in Education (Vol. I). Paris.
Sakız, H., & Woods, C. (2014). Achieving inclusion of students with disabilities in Turkey: current challenges and future prospects. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3116(April), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2014.902122
Srivastava, M., Boer, A., & Pijl, S. J. (2015). Inclusive education in developing countries: a closer look at its implementation in the last 10 years. Educational Review, 67(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.847061
Sucuoğlu, B., & Kargın, T. (2011). İlköğretimde kaynaştırma uygulamaları: Yaklaşımlar yöntemler teknikler.
Tiwari, A., Das, A., & Sharma, M. (2015). Inclusive education a “rhetoric” or “reality”? Teachers’ perspectives and beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 52, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.09.002
UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. https://doi.org/E D -94/WS/ 1 8
UNESCO. (1997). International standard classification of education ISCED 1997. Vasa. Retrieved from www.uis.unesco.org
UNICEF. (1859). Declaration of the rights of the child. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020860400013243
United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. Un, 72. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Zetu, H. (2006). The Right to Education. Challenges, 3(3), 1–12.