DOMAIN SPECIFIC BELIEFS ABOUT WRITING AND WRITING PERFORMANCE OF PRESERVICE ENGLISH TEACHERS: IS THERE ANY RELATIONSHIP?

Seray Tanyer

Abstract


Learning as a retrospective phenomenon can make learners transmit their past as an ingredient while they are (re)structuring their present and future. Previous and present experiences can form a basis for cognitive, behavioral and motivational factors which can create a cognitive load for learners and affect their learning process. In this regard, current study aims to investigate first-year undergraduates’ beliefs about writing and relation of these beliefs to writing performance in essay writing. A total of 147 students studying in ELT department of a Turkish university participated in the research. Their domain-specific beliefs about writing were determined through the Beliefs about Writing Survey (BAWS). Writing performance was measured on an essay writing task by calculating both overall grade and six component grades. As a result, multiple regression analysis affirmed that beliefs about writing accounted for writing performance independently. Pearson correlation values showed that some beliefs about writing were adaptive and associated with higher writing scores (e.g. “Adapt to the Audience”). Also, some belief subcategories were associated with each other. The results of the present study have been discussed along with the related literature on beliefs about writing and writing performance. Implications/suggestions related to the coursework, writing practices and future research have been presented.

Keywords: beliefs about writing, foreign language writing, writing performance, preservice English teachers, teacher training. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrade, H. G., & Boulay, B. A. (2003). Role of rubric-referenced self-assessment in learning to write. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 21-34.

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175-1184.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

Beach, R., & Friedrich, T. (2006). Response to writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 222-234). New York: Guilford.

Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D., & Zumbrunn, S. (2011). Writing viewed as transmission and transaction: An empirical study of implicit writing beliefs. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

Charney, D., Newman, J. H., & Palmquist, M. (1995). “I’m just no good at writing”: Epistemological style and attitudes toward writing. Written Communication, 12(3), 298-329.

Cramer, R. L. (2001). Creative power: The nature and nurture of children’s writing. New York: Logman.

Daly, J. A., & Miller, M. D. (1975). The empirical development of an instrument to measure writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 9(3), 242-249.

Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (4th ed.). New York: Merrill.

Graham, S., Schwartz, S. S., & MacArthur, C. A. (1993). Knowledge of writing and the composing process, attitude toward writing, and self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(4), 237-249.

Jacobs, H. L., Hartfield, V. F., Hughey, J. B., & Vormuth, D. R. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House Publishers.

Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: a cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1-26.

Lavelle, E. (1993). Development and validation of an inventory to assess to processes in college composition. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(3), 489-499.

Lavelle, E. (2001). Writing styles of college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 32(1), 60-67.

Lavelle, E. (2003). Writing approaches of college students: A relational perspective. TLAR, 8(2), 5-17.

Lavelle, E., & Guarino, A. J. (2003). A multidimensional approach to understanding college writing. Educational Psychology, 23(3), 295-305.

Lavelle, E., Smith, J., & O’Ryan, L. (2002). The writing approaches of secondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 399-418.

Lavelle, E., & Zuercher, N. (2001). The writing approaches of university students. Higher Education, 42(3), 373-391.

McCarthy, P., Meier, S., & Rinderer, R. (1985). Self-efficacy and writing: A different view of self-evaluation. College Composition and Communication, 36(4), 465-471.

Meier, S., McCarthy, P. R., & Schmeck, R. R. (1984). Validity of self-efficacy as a predictor of writing performance. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8(2), 107-120.

Miller, C. R., & Charney, D. (2008). Persuasion, audience, and argument. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing (pp. 583-598). New York: Erlbaum.

National Commission on Writing. (2003, April). The neglected “R”: The need for a writing revolution. Retrieved November 2, 2013, from http://www.writingcommission.org/report.html

Nelson, N. (2008). The reading-writing nexus in discourse research. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing (pp. 435-450). New York: Erlbaum.

Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1999). Grade level and gender differences in the writing self-beliefs of middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 390-405.

Palmquist, M., & Young, R. (1992). The notion of giftedness and student expectations about writing. Written Communication, 9(1), 137-168.

Perry, K. R. (2011). Implicit beliefs about writing: a task-specific study of implicit beliefs. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsdiss/119/.

Prat-Sala, M. & Redford P. (2012). Writing essays: does self-efficacy matter? The relationship between self-efficacy in reading and in writing and undergraduate students’ performance in essay writing. Educational Psychology, 32(1), 9–20.

Sanders-Reio, J. (2010). Investigation of the relations between domain-specific beliefs about writing, writing self-efficacy, writing apprehension, and writing performance in undergraduates. (Master’s Thesis). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 3409651).

Sanders-Reio, J., Alexander, P., A., Reio, T., G. & Newman, I. (2014). Do students’ beliefs about writing relate to their writing self-efficacy, apprehension, and performance? Learning & Instruction, 33, 1-11.

Schraw, G., & Bruning, R. (1996). Readers’ implicit models of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 290-305.

Schraw, G., & Bruning, R. (1999). How implicit models of reading affect motivation to read and reading engagement. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 281-302.

Shell, D. F., Murphy, C.C., & Bruning, R. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 91-100.

Silva, T., & Nicholls, J. G. (1993). College students as writing theorists: Goals and beliefs about the causes of success. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(3), 281-293.

Tanyer, S. (2014). The relationship between preservice English teachers' domain specific beliefs about writing and writing performance: A sample study. (Master’s Thesis). Avaliable from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp. (Thesis No: 375298).

Tanyer, S., (2015). The role of writing and reading self-efficacy in first-year preservice EFL teachers’ writing performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 38-43.

Tanyer, S., & Subaşı, G. (2016). Domain specific beliefs about writing: A qualitative inquiry on first-year pre-service English teachers. ELT Research Journal, 5(4), 278-303.

Tanyer, S. (2017). How do first-year pre-service English teachers revise their written works? The reported practices of revision process. Manuscript submitted for publication.

White, M. J., & Bruning, R. (2005). Implicit writing beliefs and their relation to writing quality. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 166-189.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845-862.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Contact:
Prof. Dr. İsmail Hakkı Mirici
Editor in Chief 

Hacettepe University 
Faculty of Education 
Department of English Language Teaching 
06800, Beytepe Ankara, Turkey

E-mail: hakkimirici@gmail.com