Novice Teacher Self-Efficacy Belief: A Study Of Scale Development

Main Article Content

Mualla Bilgin Aksu
Çiğdem Apaydın
Gamze Kasalak

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a scale on Novice Teacher Self-efficacy Belief (NTSB). In the development of NTSB scale, three steps, namely Study1, Study2 and Study3 were followed. Three dimensions and eighteen items were obtained as a result of the validity and reliability analyses of NTSB in Study1. In this study, it was confirmed that the dimensions of NTSB were strong in terms of internal consistency, but limited in terms of the explanatory power of the structure. In Study2, validity and reliability analyses of the scale obtained from Study1 were repeated, and a scale with ten items and two dimensions was obtained. Study3 was conducted by combining the data gathered in Study1 and Study2.

Key words: self-efficacy, novice teacher, teacher self-efficacy, scale development, reliability, validity

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Mualla Bilgin Aksu, Akdeniz University

Mualla BILGIN AKSU is Professor of Educational Sciences in the Faculty of Education, as well as the Head of Educational Administration and Supervision Program for the Graduate Institute of Educational Sciences at the University of Akdeniz in Antalya, Turkey. Her prior work experience includes twelve years in the primary schools as a teacher, six years in the Ministry of National Education as an educational expert. Her research interests include job stress, clinical supervision, peer coaching, strategic planning and TQM, teacher leadership, ethical leadership, educational leadership and policies, novice teachers, and theory - practice relations. Contact: Akdeniz University, Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Science, Campus 07058, Antalya, Turkey. Address correspondence to Mualla BILGIN AKSU, Akdeniz University, Faculty of Education, Antalya, 07058, Turkey. Tel: + 90 242 310 21 04. Fax: + 90 242 226 19 53 Email: [email protected].

Çiğdem Apaydın, Akdeniz University

Çiğdem APAYDIN is assistant research as a PhD. in the Education Faculty at the Akdeniz University. Her research includes workaholic, academic staff, mentoring, corruption, equity. Address correspondence to Çiğdem Apaydın, Akdeniz University, Faculty of Education, Antalya, 07058, Turkey. Tel: + 90 532 200 5771. Fax: + 90 242 226 19 53 E-mail: [email protected].

Gamze Kasalak, Akdeniz University

Gamze KASALAK is a Ph.D. student for Educational Administration and Supervision Program. Her research interest includes organizational cynicism, ethical leadership and higher education policy. Address correspondence to Gamze Kasalak, Akdeniz University, Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Sciences, Campus 07058, Antalya, Turkey. Tel: + 90 506 330 62 86. Fax: + 90 242 226 19 Email: [email protected].

References

Altunçekiç, A., Yaman, S., & Koray, Ö. (2005). The Research on prospective teachers’ selfefficacy belief level and problem solving skills. Kastamonu Education Journal. 13(1), 93- 102.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self – efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191- 215.

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998)

Bümen, N. (2009). The investigation of self - efficacy belief primary and secondary school teachers': The example of Izmir. XVIII. National Educational Sciences Congress, 1- 3 October 2009, İzmir.

Brouwers, A. & Tomic, W. (2001). The factorial validity of scores on the teacher ınterpersonal self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 433–445.

Carretero-Dios, H., De los Santos-Roig, M. & Buela-Casal, G. (2007). Influence of the difficulty of the matching familiar figures test–20 on the assessment of reflection impulsivity: An item analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.10.001

Çapri, B. & Çelikkaleli, Ö. (2008). Investigations of perspective teachers' attitudes towards teaching and professional self- efficacy beliefs according to their gender, programs, and faculties. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(15), 33- 53.

Çoklar, A. N. (2008). Assessing the self-efficacy of teacher candidates concerning the educational technology standards. Doctoral Dissertation, Anadolu University, Turkey.

Demiralay, R. & Karadeniz, Ş. (2010). The effect of use of information and communication technologies on elementart student teachers' perceived information leteracy self-efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10(2), 841- 851.

Dellinger, A. B., Bobbett, J. J., Olivier, D. F., & Ellet C. D. (2008). Measuring teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Development and use of the TEBS-Self. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 751–766.

Friedman & Kass (2002). Teacher self-efficacy: A classroom-organization conceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(6), 675–686.

Gibbs, C. (2002). Effective teaching exercising self – efficacy and thought control of action. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002390.htm

Gülev, D. (2008). Preservice biology teachers' misconceptions, self- efficacy beliefs and attitude toward biology teaching in biology subjects. Master’s Thesis, Gazi University, Turkey.

Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tahtam, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Harurluoğlu, Y. ve Kaya, E. (2009). The self-efficacy beliefs towards biology teaching of pre-service biology teachers. Uludag University The Journal of Education, 22(2), 481- 496.

Jeong, J. (2004). Analysis of the factors and the roles of HRD in organizational learning styles as identified by key informants at selected corporations in the Republic of Korea, Doctoral dissertation. Texas A & M University, USA.

Jöreskog, K.G. & Sörbom, D. (2001), Lisrel 8: User’s Reference Guide, Scientific Software International, Chicago.

MEB (1995). Ministry of Education regulations regarding training to novice officers. The Journal of Tebliğler, 2423, Retrieved from http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/42.html.

Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. J. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74, Retrieved from http://www.mpr-online.de.

Schunk, D.H. (1991). Self efficacy and academic motivation. Education Psychologists, 26(3&4), 207 -231.

Skaalvik, E.M. & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 611–625.

Sümer, N. (2000). Structural equation model: Basic concepts and sample applications. Turkish Psychological Articles, 3(6), 49–74.

Taşkın, Ç. Ş. & Hacıömeroğlu, G. (2010). Adaptation of the teachers' efficacy beliefs system - self form and primary teachers' self - efficacy beliefs. Dokuz Eylül University Buca Faculty of Education Journal, 27, 63 – 75.

Tavşancıl, E. (2002). The measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. Ankara: Nobel Press.

Yılmaz, G., Yılmaz, B. & Türk, N. (2010). Over - graduate thesis physical education and sports teacher's self-efficacy of their jobs (Nevşehir city model). Selçuk University Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 12(2), 85 -90.