Do Language Examinations Influence How Teachers Teach
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Examination influence on teaching, known as washback, has been found on curriculum, materials and attitudes to teaching. Evidence of washback on how and why teachers teach, however, has proved harder to identify. This paper looks in detail at three complicating factors in washback research; the variety of terms used, conflicting findings and the nature of positive or negative washback. The paper describes a study that used discourse analysis in order to investigate examination influences on teacher talk. Findings suggest that washback on how teachers teach, if present, may lie in some categories of teacher talk but not in others.
Article Details
Authors retain copyright to their work, licensing it under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License and grant the journal exclusive right of first publication with the work simultaneously and it allows others to copy and redistribute the work for non-commercial purposes, with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in IOJET and provided that no changes were made on the article.
References
Ábrahám, K. & Jilly, V. (1999). The school-leaving examination in Hungary. In Fekete, H., Major, É. & Nikolov, M. (eds.), English language education in Hungary: A baseline study (pp.21-53). Budapest: The British Council.
Alderson, J. C. & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1996). TOEFL preparation courses: A study of washback. Language Testing, 13, 280-297.
Alderson, J. C. & Szollás, K. (2000). The context: The current school-leaving examination. In Alderson, J. C., Edit, N. and Enikö, Ö. (eds.), English Language Education in Hungary, Part II (pp.9-21). Budapest: The British Council.
Alderson, J. C. & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14, 115-129.
Allwright, D. (1991). The Death of the Method. Lancaster: Lancaster University, Centre for Research in Language Education.
Allwright, D. & Bailey, K., M (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Andrews, S. (1995). Washback or washout? The relationship between examination reform and curriculum innovation. In Bringing about change in language education, Nunan, D., Berry, R. and Berry, V. (eds.). Hong Kong: Department of Curriculum Studies, University of Hong Kong, 67-81.
Andrews, S., Fullilove, J. & Wong, Y. (2002). Targeting washback-a case study. System, 30, 207-233.
Anthony, E. M. (1963). Approach, method and technique. ELT Journal, 18, 63-67.
Author, (2006). Examination influence on how teachers teach: a study of teacher talk. Unpublished PhD thesis. Lancaster.
Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: OUP.
Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 257-279.
Burrows, C. (2004). Washback in classroom-based assessment: A study of the washback effect in the Australian adult migrant English programme. In Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods, Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y. and With Curtis, A. (eds.). New Jersey: Laurence Earle Brown Associates, 3- 18.
Cadorath, J. & Harris, S. (1998). Unplanned classroom language and teacher training. ELT Journal, 52, 188-196.
Chapman, D. W. & Snyder, C. W. J. (2000). Can high-stakes national testing improve instruction: re-examining conventional wisdom. International Journal of Educational Development, 20, 457-474.
Cheng, L. (1997). How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong Kong. Language and education, 11, 38-54.
Cheng, L. (1998). Impact of a public English examination change on students' perceptions and attitudes toward their English learning. Studies in educational evaluation, 23, 279-301.
Cheng, L. (1999). Changing assessment: Washback on teacher perceptions and actions. Teaching and teacher education, 253-271.
Cullen, R. (1998). Teacher talk and the classroom context. ELT Journal, 52, 179-187.
Dinsmore, D. (1985). Waiting for Godot in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 39, 225-234.
Duff, P. A. (2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: A ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 23, 289-322.
Edwards, D. & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frederiksen, J. R. (1984). The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning. American Psychologist 39, 193-202.
Hall, J. K. (1998). Differential teacher attention to student utterances: The construction of different opportunities for learning in the IRF. Linguistics and education, 9, 287-311.
Hawkey, R. (2004). Cambridge ESOL CPE textbook washback study: Full report university of Cambridge ESOL examinations, Cambridge
Hayes, B. & Read, J. (2004). IELTS test preparation in New Zealand: Preparing students for the IELTS academic module. Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y. and With Curtis, A. (eds.). New Jersey: Laurence Earle Brown Associates, 3- 18.
HayMcBer (2000). Research into teacher effectiveness: A model of teacher effectiveness. London: Department for Education and Employment.
Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: CUP.
Kellaghan, T. & Greaney, V. (1992). Using examinations to improve education: A Study of 14 African Countries. Washington DC: The World bank.
Kiss-Gulyas, J. (2001). Experiencing the examination design, content, materials and procedures. In English Language Education in Hungary, Part IlI: Training teachers for new examinations, Együd, J. G., Gál, I. A. and Author, P. (eds.). Budapest: The British Council, 40-58.
Kumaravadevilu, B. (1993). Maximizing learning potential in the communicative classroom. ELTJ, 47, 12-21.
Lier, L. v. (1988). The Classroom and the language learner: Ethnography and second-language classroom research. Harlow: Longman.
Madaus, G. F. (1988). The influence of testing on the curriculum. In Critical issues in curriculum: 87th yearbook of the national society for the study of education, Tanner, L N (Ed). Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.
McDonough, S. (2002). Applied linguistics in language education. London: Arnold.
Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 241-256.
Mori, J. (2002). Task design, plan, and development of talk-in-interaction: an analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese Language Classroom. Applied Linguistics, 23, 289-322.
Muijs, D. & Reynolds, D. (2005). Effective Teaching: Evidence and Practice. London: Sage.
Nikolov, M. (1999). Classroom Observation Project. In English Language Education in Hungary: A Baseline Study, Fekete, H., Major, E and Nikolov, M (eds.). Budapest: The British Council Hungary, 221-246.
Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal, 41, 136-145.
Ohta, A. S. (1999). Interactional routines and the socialisation of interactional style in adult learners of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1493-1512.
Oskarsson, M. (1973). Comparative method studies in foreign language teaching. MODERNA SPRÅK, LXVI, 350-366.
Popham, J. (1987). The merits of measurement driven instruction. Phi Delta Kappa, May 1987, 679-682.
Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method - Why? TESOL Quarterly, 24, 161-176.
Prodromou, L. (1995). The backwash effect from testing to teaching. ELT Journal, 49, 13-25.
Qi, L. (2005). Has a high-stakes test produced the intended changes? Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y. and With Curtis, A. (eds.). New Jersey: Laurence Earle Brown Associates, 3- 18.
Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A Description and Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, D. (2000). Analysis of Moving Images. In Qualitative researching with text, image and sound, Bauer, M. W. and Gaskell, G. (eds.). London: Sage, 246-262.
Seedhouse, P. (1996). Classroom interaction: possibilities and impossibilities. ELT Journal, 50 (1),
-24.
Shohamy, E., Donitsa-Schmidt, S. & Ferman, I. (1996). Test impact revisited: Washback effect over time. Language testing, 13, 298-317.
Sinclair, J. (1982). The Structure of teacher talk. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
Smith, M. L., Edelsky, C., Draper, K., Rottenberg, C. & Cherland, M. (1991). The role of testing in elementary schools. Los Angeles, California: Arizona State University
UCLA centre for research and educational standards and student tests.
Spratt, M. (2005). Washback and the classroom: The implications for teaching and learning of studies of washback from exams. Language Teaching Research, 9, 5-29.
Stecher, B., Chun, T. & Barron, S. (2004). The effects of assessment-driven reform on the teaching of writing in Washington State. Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y. and With Curtis, A. (eds.). New Jersey: Laurence Earle Brown Associates, 3- 18.
Thornbury, S. (1996). Teachers research teacher talk. ELT Journal, 50, 279-289.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wall, D. (1999). The impact of high-stakes examinations on classroom teaching: A case study using insights from testing and innovation theory. Department of Linguistics and Modern English Language, Lancaster University Unpublished PhD thesis
Wall, D. (2000). The impact of high-stakes testing on teaching and learning: Can this be predicted or controlled? System, 28, 499-509.
Wall, D. (2005). The impact of high-stakes examinations on classroom teaching. Cambridge: CUP.
Wall, D. & Alderson, J. C. (1993). Examining washback: The Sri Lankan impact study. Language Testing, 10, 41-69.
Watanabe, Y. (1996). Does grammar-translation co,me from the entrance examination? Preliminary findings from classroom-based research. Language testing, 13, 318-333.
Watanabe, Y. (2004). Methodology in washback studies. Cheng, L., Watanabe, Y. and With Curtis, A. (eds.). New Jersey: Laurence Earle Brown Associates, 3- 18.
Wesdorp, H. (1982). Backwash effects of language-testing in primary and secondary education. Journal of Applied Language Study, 40-55.
Young, R. F. & Nguyen, H. T. (2002). Modes of meaning in high school science. Applied Linguistics, 23, 348-372.