A Difficulty Analysis of Cleft Sentences
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This empirical study was investigated to define how difficult the clefts sentences for the EFL freshman students and to describe the difficulty levels of types of cleft sentences. The study examined to what extend instruction on cleft sentences clarified the EFL freshman students’ confusion in cleft structures. The data administrated by 61 freshman students at the Department of English Language Literature (ELL) in a state university in Turkey was collected through the pre-test and post-test design. The results revealed that participants showed a significant improvement in understanding the cleft structures. In addition, there are significant differences among students’ level of recognition for each type of cleft structure and the most confusing cleft types for the EFL students are it-clefts, if-because cleft and all-cleft.
Article Details
Authors retain copyright to their work, licensing it under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License and grant the journal exclusive right of first publication with the work simultaneously and it allows others to copy and redistribute the work for non-commercial purposes, with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in IOJET and provided that no changes were made on the article.
References
Azar, B. S. (1998). Understanding and Using English Grammar 3rd Ed. Pearson Education: US.
Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Leech, G. (2002). Longman’s Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Pearson Education: US.
Chomsky, N. (1977). Essays on Form and Interpretation. New York: North-Holland.
Crystal, D. (2004). Making Sense of Grammar. Longman Press.
Demirezen, M. (1995). From Sentence to Paragraph Structure. Ankara: Adim Yayinlari, (Enlarged 2nd Edition).
Demirezen, M. (2013). PhD Lecture Notes on Fossilization. Ankara: Hacettepe University.
Gass, S. (1988). Integrating research areas: a framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics 9.2: 198–217.
Greenbaum, S. (1996). Oxford English Grammar. Oxford University Press.
Han, Z. (2004). Fossilization in Adult Second Language Acquisition: Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Han, Z., & Selinker, L. (2005). Fossilization in L2 Learners. In Hinkel, E. (Editor). Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kellerman, E. (1989). The imperfect condition: Fosslization, cross-linguistic influence and natural tendencies in a foreign language setting. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive grammar. Vol. I, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Maurer, J. (2005). Focus on Grammar Third Edition Level 5. Pearson Press.
Miller, J. (1996). Clefts, particles and word order in languages of Europe. Language Sciences, 18(1-2):111–125.
Öndeş, N. S. (2004). ELS: English Grammar Inside and Out. ELS Yayıncılık Ltd.
Sedaris, D. (1997). Naked. Little, Brown & Company.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, (3), 209-231.
Selinker, L., & Lamendella, J. (1979). The Role of extrinsic feedback in interlangauge fossilization: A discussion of rule fossilization: A tentative model. Language Learning, 29(2), 363-75.