Main Article Content

Philip Glover


Talk is a key component of teaching and learning and teacher talk is an important part of how a teacher teaches. This paper discusses principles and approaches for analysing teacher talk in classroom interaction in order to investigate its effectiveness. The paper presents four reasons for analysing teacher talk: the role of interaction in the management of learning, the analysable, interpretable and explainable nature of discourse, the value of analysing effective teaching and the existence of categories of teacher talk that support the investigation of effective teaching. These categories are based on a framework of Elicitations, Responses and Descriptions from Mercer (1995). The paper also looks at issues of reliability, validity and generalisability of findings. The paper concludes that a focus on categories of teacher talk can support academic research, for the supervision and evaluation of teachers by managers, as well as for self-development purposes by teachers themselves. 

Article Details

Author Biography

Philip Glover, Suleyman Demirel University- Turkey

Philip Glover has taught and trained teachers in Turkey, Cyprus, UK, Hungary and Serbia. He has worked in English language teaching as a manager and as a consultant with testing and in-service training projects. 


Allwright, D., & Bailey, K., M (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barry, C. A. (1998). Choosing Qualitative Data Analysis Software: Atlas/ti and Nudist Compared. Sociological Research Online, 3(3), .

Cadorath, J., & Harris, S. (1998). Unplanned classroom language and teacher training. ELT Journal, 52(3), 188- 196.

Campbell, R. J., Kyriades, L., Muijs, R. D., & Robinson, W. (2003). Differential teacher effectiveness: towards a model for research and teacher appraisal. Oxford Review of Education, 29(3), 347- 362.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.

Creemers, B. P. M., & Reynolds, D. (1996). Issues and implications of international effectiveness research. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(3), 257-266.

Cullen, R. (1998). Teacher talk and the classroom context. ELT Journal, 52(3), 179-187.

Dinsmore, D. (1985). Waiting for Godot in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 39(4), 225-234.

Duff, P. A. (2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: a ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 289-322.

Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gee, J. P. (1999). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis Theory and Method. London: Routledge.

Glover, P. (2006). Examination influence on how teachers teach: a study of teacher talk. Lancaster, Unpublished PhD Thesis.

Glover, P. (2014). Do Language Examinations Influence How Teachers Teach? International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 1(3), 197-214.

Hall, J. K. (1998). Differential teacher attention to student utterances: the construction of different opportunities for learning in the IRF. Linguistics and education, 9(3), 287-311.

Hayes, B., & Read, J. (2004). IELTS test preparation in New Zealand: preparing students for the IELTS academic module. In L. Cheng, Y.

Watanabe & A. with Curtis (Eds.), (pp. 3- 18). New Jersey: Laurence Earle Brown Associates.

HayMcBer (2000). Research into teacher effectiveness: A model of teacher effectiveness. London: Department for Education and Employment.

Kumaravadevilu, B. (1993). Maximizing learning potential in the communicative classroom. ELTJ, 47(1), 12-21.

Lewis, B. R. (1998). ATLAS/ti and NUD·IST: A Comparative Review of Two Leading Qualitative Data Analysis Packages. Cultural Anthropology Methods, 10(3), 41-47.

Lier, L. v. (1988). The classroom and the language learner:ethnography and second-language classroom research. Harlow: Longman.

Lyle, S. (2002). Talking to Learn: The Voices of Children, Aged 9–11, Engaged in Role-play. LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 16(4), 303-317.

Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.

McDonough, S. (2002). Applied Linguistics in language education. London: Arnold.

Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Mercer, N. (2000). Words and Minds: how we use language to think together. London: Routledge.

Mori, J. (2002). Task Design, Plan, and Development of Talk-in-interaction: an analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese Language Classroom. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 289-322.

Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2001). Effective Teaching: evidence and practice. London: Sage.

Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2005). Effective Teaching: evidence and practice (Second ed.). London: Sage.

Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language teaching: making it work. ELT Journal, 41(2), 136-145.

Ohta, A. S. (1999). Interactional routines and the socialisation of interactional style in adult learners of Japanese. Journal of pragmatics, 31, 1493-1512.

Preedy, M. (1993). Managing the effective school. London: Open University.

Reynolds, D. (1999). Better teachers, better schools: Pearson Publishing.

Reynolds, D., Davies, R., & Phillips, D. (1989). The Cardiff programme: an effective school improvement project based upon school effectiveness research. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7), 801- 814.

Reynolds, D., & Muijs, D. (2000a). Advanced teaching methods (pp. 8): Pearson Publishing.

Reynolds, D., & Muijs, D. (2000b). Effective teaching: British research (pp. 6): Pearson Publishing.

Reynolds, D., & Muijs, D. (2000c). Effective teaching: international research (pp. 6): Pearson Publishing.

Reynolds, D., & Muijs, D. (2000d). It's the classroom stupid (pp. 6): Pearson Publishing.

Sammons, P. (1999). School Effectiveness. Lisse ; Exton, PA: Swets & Zeitlinger.

Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key Characteristics of Effective Schools. London: Office for Standards in Education.

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

Seale, C. (2000). Using computers to analyse qualitative data. In D.

Silverman (Ed.), Doing qualitative research; a practical handbook (pp. 154-174). London: Sage.

Seidel, J. V. (1998). Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 15). Qualis Research.

Sinclair, J. (1982). The structure of teacher talk. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

Tabberer, R. (1994). School and Teacher Effectiveness. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.

Teddlie, C. a. R., David (2000). The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research. London and New York: Falmer Press.

Thornbury, S. (1996). Teachers research teacher talk. ELT Journal, 50(4), 279-289.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language teaching research, 6(1), 3-23.

Walsh, S. (2006). Talking the talk of the TESOL classroom. ELT J, 60(2), 133-141.

Wood, L. a., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis Methods for studying action in talk and text. London: Sage.

Wrigley, T. (2003). Is 'School Effectiveness' anti-democratic? British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 89-112.

Young, R. F., & Nguyen, H. T. (2002). Modes of meaning in high school science. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 348-372.